🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” said the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through civil society groups.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Recently, WHO officials issued a warning that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of business advocacy globally. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be reduced to 30% or 50% “following international suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum one year after the legislation is approved.

The WHO specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, suggesting that it would lead smokers to “illegally traded” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for multiple violations “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the managing director of the Zambian branch claims the firm is “committed to responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “specific rules can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We live in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and harvest that and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative commented: “The company operates its operations according with applicable local laws. Additionally, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which provide for stakeholder participation in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, noting that underage people should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to accomplish desired public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which encompasses increasing amounts of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.