🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

According to recent research, the average family pays $27,000 annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from both employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what average American pays. I know dozens of businesses that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, those payments also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection along with funding medical services. When including these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's military, technology, social programs and transportation services, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer would be privy to workers' health histories for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect amid present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that big changes are necessary.